A sociologists view of the war on drugs

A person who has taken high-quality heroin several times a day over a period of time is un4uestionably physically dependent on heroin.

Thus there is a popular conception of drugs mainly illegal drugs and a psychopharmacological definition psychoactive drugs that are somewhat independent of one another. In Canada, predictably, anti-opium legislation also resulted in the creation of covert smuggling operations, which resulted in the price of opium rising dramatically.

Since "abuse" clearly connotes something negative or bad, to employ the term is to discredit and stigmatize drug use rather than to understand or describe it. Erickson, eds Illicit Drugs in Canada: We shop around for evidence in much the same way that we trundle through a supermarket, selecting here and there.

Whether this was entirely true seems, for the most part, to be debatable.

The War on Drugs

Other symbols can also be important. But what of the other popular edict of the anti-drug organizations and police and Presidents Reagan and Bush and Prime Minister Mulroney, etc.

A conflict theorist would argue that the war on drugs:

In any dispute, we not only want to be morally right, whatever that might entail; we also want to be empirically and scientifically correct. In contrast, if you take or are administered a nonaddicting drug such as marijuana over a period of time, nothing essentially will happen to you when you are "withdrawn" from the drug.

Because many subjective feelings have no "scientific" or empirical validity, traditional positivistic pharmacology and behaviorist psychology have avoided levels of experience conveyed by the subject through language, through explanations of what he feels. There is enormous leeway, then, in presenting different views of a phenomenon, especially one as controversial as drug use.

This remained a non-issue with most people, until Chinese immigration was seen to be threatening the livelihood of white workers Boyd,who were feeling the effects of decline in railway employment and the gold rush in British Columbia Solomon and Green, The term "narcotic" has been used in two radically different ways in our society.

This brief description should help make this writing about the sociologist view of the war on drugs a little easier to understand. Functionalism Recall that functionalism emphasizes the usefulness of certain behaviors and social institutions for many aspects of society.

Medical "authorities" label continued or even sporadic marijuana use as "dependence" for the simple reason that they cannot understand why anyone should want to use it at all. In short, instead of adopting the narrow and arbitrary conventions of traditional behaviorism, ignoring verbal statements and self-descriptions of feelings and experience as irrational or epiphenomenal, I am suggesting that a truly scientific approach toward reality would be to accept them as one dimension of phenomena under study.

Why is There a 'War on Drugs'?

Unfortunately this war is going to cost 1. It was completed on December 23, Further, there seems to be no effort on the part of the Canadian Government to evaluate whether the War on Drugs is necessary.

Each of these two concepts requires that one person in the case of the moral entrepreneur or any segment of society in the case of status politics attempts to create rules that others must follow.Conflict concepts sketch awareness of electrical power differentials, like class conflict, and usually compare in times past principal ideologies.

Hence, it is A macro instruction stage investigation connected with club. Karl Marx could be the papa with the societal battle hypothesis, a component of the 4 paradigms regarding sociology.

In their view, the war on terrorism after 9/11 and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan “have only deepened the trend toward ever more concentrated state, corporate, and military power in a society that ostensibly embraces democratic values” (Boggs,p.

ix). The war on drugs in our culture is a continuous action that is swiftly lessening our society. This has been going on for roughly years and has yet to slow down in any way.

Drugs continue to be a problem for the obvious reason that certain people abuse them in a way that can lead to ultimate. A sociological view of the social conflict theory on the “war on drugs”would depict that the conflict theory argues that crime and criminal justice in the modern world is designed to benefit the upper, p classes, while subjugating the lower classes.

Sociologists have three main paradigms that they can coincide with people to learn they function under certain circumstances. The paradigms used are the Structural-Functional, Social-Conflict and Symbolic-Interaction.

This brief description should help make this writing about the sociologist view of the war on drugs a little easier to. The War on Drugs is an industry, one with vested interests with a powerful motivation to ensure its continued existence and expansion, regardless of any objective cost-benefit analysis of the consequences of incarcerating such a large proportion of the population or even of the effectiveness of our policies for actually decreasing drug use.

A sociologists view of the war on drugs
Rated 4/5 based on 42 review